Acronyms: GDP: Gross
Domestic Product. HDI: Human Development Index. ICV: In-country Volunteer.
NFED: Non-formal Education Division.NGO: Non-governmental Organisation. PPP:
Purchasing Power Parity. SDGs: Sustainable Development Goals. SSA: Sub-Saharan
Africa. UKV: United Kingdom Volunteer. WTO: World Trade Organisation.
Tackling a topic as large as the constraints on
Ghana’s development, in just over a page, is almost impossible. Having just
completed an MSc in Political Economy of Late Development at the LSE, I have
barely scratched the surface of some of the factors that can hold back
development. This is because the topic encompasses a wealth of theory, from
contrasting perspectives, on areas as diverse as trade, demographics and
climate change. If there is a dichotomy within academic writing between
parsimony and complexity, this blog adopts the former strategy. To filter which
development theories to integrate, I will relate them to my experiences in
Ghana, both within and outside of my work. In this way, I will personally
evaluate whether these theories accurately depict the constraints that I have
identified. In other words: is Ghana an example or an exception to development
theories? Analysing constraints on development is inevitably quite
gloomy, but perhaps you might consider solutions as you read.
What is development? The answer is subjective; I
will rely on Sen's influential definition of development as the expansion of
the social, economic and political ‘freedoms enjoyed by the members of society'
(1999, p.3). While expanding GDP per capita is often construed as an ‘ends' to
development, Sen criticises this, arguing that earning a higher income is
merely a ‘means' to development. Why? If you were denied any education but were
granted £1million, would you be capable of spending it to better your life?
What if you died of a tropical disease before you could spend it? These are
examples of constraints on development (as freedom). The ‘ends' of development
should be to expand individual's freedoms, e.g. by improving their access to
schools, family planning and health services. For example, our partner
organisation, the NFED, gives rural, illiterate women an education. Giving them
this freedom will expand their incomes, which is our primarily objective. This is reflected in International Service adopting a
human rights based approach to development; a higher income is not necessarily
a right, but education, suffrage and gender equality are. Development is
freedom and rights secure your freedom.
Corruption is commonly cited as constraints to
development (Krueger, 1997, p.13), especially in Africa (Mkandawire, 1988,
p.17). The frequent police stops that I have experienced here, in which
licenses are often handed out of the window with a bank note underneath to be
allowed through, indicates that corruption is pervasive. Evidencing this,
Transparency International ranks Ghana as the 61st most corrupt
country of the 175 considered (2014). Similarly, neopatrimonialism has been
described as endemic in Africa (Altenberg, 2011, p.10; Kohli, 2004, p.342),
which is a system whereby trading of favours and state resources with known
connections is the principle method to secure loyalty and move up the social
hierarchy. This is a barrier to development as it supersedes the efficient
transfer of resources. I believe that neopatrimonialism is a serious issue in
Ghana; many ICVs have justifiably lamented the difficulty of securing a job
without family or political connections and favour trading (with a member of my
team joking that the first and most important interview question in, say,
a law firm, is typically ‘which member of your family is a lawyer?’). This
difficulty in securing a job by graduates, in particular, is captured in
‘skills paradox’ theory, which considers whether ‘jobless’ growth in SSA is a
consequence of employers being unable to find enough skilled workers(DIAL,
2007). For Ghana I find this argument, that there is a sufficient demand for
skilled workers but insufficient supply of top graduates, to be unconvincing
for several reasons. Firstly, all of the ICVs in my team are graduates, they
are at least as capable as UKV graduates, yet I have not heard this skills
deficit argument applied in the UK. Secondly, I believe that the neopatrimonial
employment process is a genuine constraint. Thirdly, Ghana is currently subject
to severe restrictions on government employment, which was a condition of its
IMF bailout in April (Ministry of Finance Republic of Ghana, 2015), closing
another key employment source for many. Finally, ICV graduates, understandably,
want the skilled jobs that they have trained for, with higher ‘reservation
wages’ than are commonly available (Filmer and Fox, 2014).
Notably, if the amount of USAID, World Vision, WHO
and UNICEF signs plastered everywhere give any indication, it seems that one of
the highest employing sectors in Ghana is NGOs and development agencies. Never
have I seen a clearer example of Easterly’s conception of ‘The Tyranny of
Experts’, where often-misguided technocrats rule (2013). While Easterly would
see such a reliance on aid as a constraint on development, Sachs would view it
as a solution as he sees aid as a means to escape the ‘poverty trap' (2005).
For brevity's sake, I will sit on the fence for that debate.
There is so much more that I would like to cover,
ranging from population to gender to microfinance, but the word count
constrains me (and spares you). For instance, I have specialised in studying
trade policy; one of my favourite pastimes is criticising the WTO, for which I
have a published essay (Pearce, 2015). I have my suspicions that WTO rules are
behind the fact that in the world’s second largest cocoa bean exporter (GBN,
2015) I am suffering from an inability to find any chocolate, but this could be
paranoia. I will just say that the constraints identified above both adhere to
and counter development theory, and that all of them have solutions. I have no
doubt that these constraints will be overcome to allow this beautiful and
friendly country to continue its rapid development. Thanks for reading.
Written by Chris Pearce
Bibliography
Altenberg, T.
(2011). Can Industrial Policy Work under Neopatrimonial Rule?. UNU-Wider
Working Paper, [online] 2011(41). Available at:
http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/working-papers/2011/en_GB/wp2011-041/_print/
[Accessed 6 Feb. 2015].
DIAL. (2007). Youth and labour markets in
Africa. A critical review of literature, Working Paper DT/2007-02, February. Available
at: https://ideas.repec.org/p/dia/wpaper/dt200702 [Accessed 12 Nov.
2015].
Easterly, W. (2013). The Tyranny of
Experts: Economists, Dictators and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor. Basic
Books.
Filmer, D. and Fox, L. (2014). Youth
Employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Africa Development Series. Washington DC:
World Bank. Available
at:http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/2014/01/19342178/youth-employment-sub-saharan-africa-vol-2-2-full-report [Accessed
13 Nov. 2015].
GBN Ghana Business News. (2015). The sad
story of Ghana's cocoa industry and the way forward.Editorials. Available
at:
http://www.ghanabusinessnews.com/2015/06/22/the-sad-story-of-ghanas-cocoa-industry-and-the-way-forward/
[Accessed 12 Nov. 2015].
Kohli, A. (2004). State-Directed Development: Political Power and Industrialisation in the Global Periphery. 1st ed. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Krueger, A. (1997). Trade Policy and Economic Development: How We Learn. American Economic Review, [online] 87(1), pp.1-22. Available at: http://www.nber.org.gate2.library.lse.ac.uk/papers/w5896 [Accessed 5 Feb. 2015].
Mkandawire, T. (1988). Road to Crisis, Adjustment and Deindustrialisation: the African Case. Africa development, [online] 13(1), pp.5-31. Available at: http://readinglists.lse.ac.uk/items/2E045D5D-D850-57D8-170E-A87F946A4FC6.html?referrer=%2Flists%2F2D0EEBAF-FCEB-3F1C-8D23-FC125B6EF09F.html%23item-2E045D5D-D850-57D8-170E-A87F946A4FC6 [Accessed 2 Feb. 2015].
Ministry of Finance Republic of Ghana.(2015). GHANA’S PROGRAMME WITH THE INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND (IMF). Briefs, [online]. Available at: http://www.mofep.gov.gh/?q=content/ghana’s-programme-international-monetary-fund-imf [Accessed 12Nov. 2015].
Pearce, C. (2015). Implications of the growing WTO mandate for Development in Poor Countries: a Counterfactual History of South Korea. The LSE Economic History Review, [online] 5(2014/2015), pp.35-43. Available at: http://lsesueconomichistory.co.uk/2015/08/10/20142015-lse-economic-history-review/ [Accessed 10 Aug. 2015].
Sachs, J. (2005). The End of Poverty. London: Penguin.
Sen, A.K. (1999). Development As Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Transparency International. (2014). Visualising The Corruption Perceptions Index 2014. Available at: http://www.transparency.org/cpi2014/infographic/global [Accessed 13 Nov. 2015].
Love it Chris, excellent blog, wish that I could read more. Jenniah.
ReplyDelete